In the semantic field there is, in an effort, "truckers strike", "truckers' stoppage", "stock-outs crisis", "business sector lockout". Regardless of the semantics, the situation that Brazilian society experiences is very serious. Structurally, we are "rododependentes", we depend on the modal route to the detriment of the railways and waterways. In terms of political conjuncture, it is possible, without hesitation, to question who is interested in the logic of how much worse. Who cares? The Temer Government is known to be weak, unpopular, with a team short of what one would expect in the field of institutional communication or political practice. The denunciations of the Office of the Attorney General have caused Temer to spend his little political capital not to be investigated and possibly removed from the presidency. As a result, his vision, obfuscated, did not have the necessary aim to understand the severity of the crisis that was approaching with the drivers as their focal point. The working conditions and the Brazilian roads are, without doubt, cruel to the truck drivers. But they are by no means the most precarious or exploited of all the workers. With this, one can peremptorily affirm that a strike or a strike would be just and legal, but what we see has already passed from the legitimacy and interests of workers. It was not enough for the bosses' digital whites in a lockout, it came to light that, at the moment, the interests are, among other things, the dismissal of Pedro Parente from Petrobrás (with announcement of strike by oil tankers whose syndicate has known connections with political party) , the change in the criteria of the price of fuels and, thankfully, the resumption of the "Outside Fear". So again, who cares little more than four months into the election, to withdraw Fear from power? Fearing is weak, bad, this is public fact; but it can not be compared, for example, to the Dilma Government, which is much, much worse. With no modesty in having turned into a "narrative factory" and no longer in a political party, PTs now even claim that gasoline and diesel are more expensive with Temer than they were with Dilma. They want to erase, as authoritarian regimes, the recent reality of managerial incapacity, populism and corruption that broke Petrobras in the "lulopetista" era. It has long been said that the Brazilian does not like capitalism, he likes a hypertrophied and benevolent state with some at the expense of everyone. Let us not deceive ourselves, then! Overthrowing Fear and betting on the logic of how much worse is not on the horizon of the democrats, the liberals, the democratic left, the Social Democrats. No. The worse is closer to autocratic positions, left and right. And in this case, one can imagine a horseshoe in which the extremes are at the ends closer than distant, in an anachronistic view, in an interventionist state, in the discourse of order, force, hierarchy. To whom, dear reader, this situation matters: Petrobras melting in the stock market, market agents raising political risks in Brazil, the improvement of the economy that was slow is already lost this year, spoiled food, millions of animals killed, prices exorbitant products? The autonomous truckers, of course, had demands, but were exploited by interests far removed from their own. There is a mismatch between history and reality with the social consciousness of individuals and groups. We lose, everyone, always, because the cost will come.